Increment & Compensation
This does not predict your company's increment. It measures how strong and well-evidenced your case is.
Increment readiness
84/100
+5Case strength
Evidence quality
76/100
Weakest component
Consistency
86/100
Across 5 months
Readiness breakdown
Performance88/100
Impact82/100
Technical Growth79/100
Ownership91/100
Evidence Quality76/100
Consistency86/100
Increment readiness over time
Are you strengthening your case before appraisal?
Am I ready to ask?
- Consistent delivery across the year
- Improving quarterly rating trajectory
- Quantified impact on at least one major item
- Increased ownership vs last year
- Challenging technical work documented
- Cross-team contribution recorded
- Stronger business metrics needed
- Stronger technical leadership evidence needed
Strong evidence base — two areas would make the conversation materially stronger.
No compensation outcome is guaranteed. This is preparation, not a prediction.
What is holding the case back?
Evidence quality (76)
Several high-value items have no ticket, PR or metric attached.
Technical growth (79)
Depth is demonstrated in debugging, but architecture artefacts are missing.
Quantified impact (82)
Only one item carries a hard number. Two more would change the conversation.