Rating Simulator
Scale 1–5. This is an advisory estimate based on your recorded evidence — it is not your company's rating.
Estimated rating
4.4/5
Previous rating
4/5
Target rating
5/5
Breakdown
Why this estimate
You have strong, well-evidenced delivery, business impact on compliance and automation work, and clear ownership of the DMI resolution.
Your weakest evidence is technical leadership and ownership of ambiguous, high-complexity problems. Several items identify an impact area but carry no number.
To move from 4.4 toward 5, the missing signal is not more tasks — it is depth, leadership visibility and quantified outcomes.
Self-rating document
Self rating: 4.4 / 5
Why
- Drove cross-team resolution of the DMI callback failure, unblocking partner UAT.
- Delivered RBI-compliant consent storage, closing a regulatory requirement.
- Automated LNT stale application expiry, clearing ~4,200 records in the first run.
- Consistent delivery across three projects with no missed commitments recorded.
Growth areas
- Technical leadership evidence is thin (3 items this quarter).
- Most owned problems were already scoped by someone else.
- Business impact is frequently identified but not quantified.
Why not 5/5
A 5 typically requires demonstrated leadership on ambiguous problems and measurable business outcomes. Both exist in your work but are under-documented in the record.
Manager rating comparison
Once you receive your actual rating, compare it honestly. The goal is learning, not arguing.